Since the Democratic primaries have been hotly contested this year, I've been thinking a bit more about the primary process in general. Specifically, i've been thinking about the difference between closed and open primaries.
The usual argument advanced in favor of closed primaries is that a person ought to have some commitment to the party of which they're voting to select the candidate. The usual argument advanced in favor of open primaries is that all voters have a stake in who the parties nominate, and one ought not be required to state an allegiance to either of them to be able to have a say. I don't have strong feelings either way.
The thing I'm wondering about is whether the argument in favor of open primaries could also reasonably used to support allowing resident aliens to vote in the general elections. The situations seem analogous to me, but I could be missing something.
If anyone in Pittsburgh happens to be reading at this hour, could you perchance recommend a furnace repairer?
Update: We have one now.
"There's no 'I' in 'deathtrap'."
This Saturday, we'd like to play a game (or two!) of Arkham Horror at our place. Starting at 1pm, going until we're done. Light refreshment will be provided. If you're interested, let me know.
I'm wanting to play Twilight Imperium 3rd edition on Saturday at our place. We have four slots open. This will likely take all day and a respectable part of the evening. Let me know if you're interested.